Does A High Haller Index Impact Outcomes in Pectus Excavatum Repair?

OBJECTIVE: Severity for pectus excavatum includes Haller index >3.25. An extremely high Haller index (≥8) may influence surgical approach and complications. This study reviews outcomes of high Haller index patients after repair. METHODS: A single institution retrospective analysis was performed on adult patients with Haller index ≥8 undergoing pectus excavatum repairs. For outcomes, a propensity-matched control group with a Haller index ≤4 was utilized. RESULTS: In total, 64 cases (mean age 33.5 ±10.9 years, Haller index 13.1 ±5.0; 56% females) were included. A minimally invasive repair was successful in 84%. A hybrid procedure was performed in the remaining either to repair fractures of the ribs (8 patients) and sternum (5 patients) or when osteotomy and/or cartilage resection is required (10 patients). In comparison with the matched cohort (Haller index ≤4), high Haller index cases had longer operative times (171 vs. 133 minutes, p<.001), more frequently required Hybrid procedures (16% vs. 2%, p=0.005), experienced higher incidences of rib (22% vs. 3%, p=0.001) and sternal fractures (12% vs. 0%, p=0.003), and had increased repair with 3 bars (50% vs. 19%, p<0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups for length of hospital stay or postoperative 30-day complications. CONCLUSION: Patients with an extremely high Haller index can be challenging cases with greater risks of fracture and need for osteotomy/cartilage resection. Despite this, minimally invasive repair techniques can be utilized in most cases without increased complications when performed by an experienced surgeon.

The electrocardiographic manifestations of pectus excavatum before and after surgical correction.

BACKGROUND: Pectus excavatum (PEx) can cause cardiopulmonary limitations due to cardiac compression and displacement. There is limited data on electrocardiogram (ECG) alterations before and after PEx surgical repair, and ECG findings suggesting cardiopulmonary limitations have not been reported. The aim of this study is to explore ECG manifestations of PEx before and after surgery including associations with exercise capacity. METHODS: A retrospective review of PEx patients who underwent primary repair was performed. ECGs before and after surgical correction were evaluated and the associations between preoperative ECG abnormalities and cardiopulmonary function were investigated. RESULTS: In total, 310 patients were included (mean age 35.1 ± 11.6 years). Preoperative ECG findings included a predominant negative P wave morphology in V1, and this abnormal pattern significantly decreased from 86.9% to 57.4% (p < 0.001) postoperatively. The presence of abnormal P wave amplitude in lead II (>2.5 mm) significantly decreased from 7.1% to 1.6% postoperatively (p < 0.001). Right bundle branch block (RBBB) (9.4% versus 3.9%, p < 0.001), rsr' patterns (40.6% versus 12.9%, p < 0.001), and T wave inversion in leads V1-V3 (62.3% vs 37.7%, p < 0.001) were observed less frequently after surgery. Preoperative presence of RBBB (OR = 4.8; 95%CI 1.1-21.6) and T wave inversion in leads V1-3 (OR = 2.3; 95%CI 1.3-4.2) were associated with abnormal results in cardiopulmonary exercise testings. CONCLUSION: Electrocardiographic abnormalities in PEx are frequent and can revert to normal following surgery. Preoperative RBBB and T wave inversion in leads V1-3 suggested a reduction in exercise capacity, serving as a marker for the need for further cardiovascular evaluation of these patients.

Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum in adults: a review article of presentation, workup, and surgical treatment.

Pectus excavatum (Pex) is one of the most common congenital deformities of the chest wall, with pectus constituting 90% of all chest wall deformities and excavatum being reported in almost 1:400 to 1:1,000 live births with predominant occurrence in males up to five times more than in females. Depending on the severity, presentation varies from mild cosmetic complaints to life limiting cardiopulmonary symptoms. Patients may develop symptoms as they age, and these symptoms may worsen over the years. A technique for minimally invasive repair for pectus excavatum (MIRPE) was introduced with the concept of temporarily implanting metal bars to correct the deformity. This has rapidly become the standard of care for the pediatric and adolescent patients. The use of MIRPE in adults, however, has been slower to adopt and more controversial. This is largely due to the increased calcification and rigidity of the chest wall in adults which can make the repair more complex and lead to a higher risk of complications. We present a literature review of the presentation, workup, and surgical treatment of adult patients with Pex undergoing MIRPE. Adult patients can, with advanced preoperative evaluations and technique modifications, undergo a highly successful repair resulting in symptom resolution and satisfying results.

Evolution of Pain Control for Adult Pectus Excavatum Repair.

BACKGROUND: Pain control after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) can be challenging, especially in adult patients undergoing surgical repair. This study reviewed different analgesic modalities used over ≥10 years after pectus repair. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent uncomplicated primary MIRPE at a single institution from October 2010 to December 2021. Patients were classified by analgesic modality used: epidural, elastomeric continuous infusion subcutaneous catheters (SC-Caths), and intercostal nerve cryoablation. Comparisons among the 3 groups were performed. RESULTS: In total, 729 patients were included (mean age, 30.9 ±10.3 years; 67% male; mean Haller index, 4.9 ±3.0). Patients in the cryoablation group required significantly lower doses of morphine equivalents (P < .001) and had overall the shortest hospital stay (mean, 1.9 ±1.5 days; P < .001) with <17% staying >2 days (vs epidural at 94% and SC-Cath at 48%; P < .001). The cryoablation group had a lower incidence of ileus and constipation (P < .001) but a higher incidence of pleural effusion requiring thoracentesis (P = .024). Mean pain scores among groups were minor (<3), and differences were insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: The use of cryoablation in conjunction with enhanced recovery pathways provided significant benefit to our patients undergoing MIRPE compared with previous analgesic modalities. These benefits included a decrease in length of hospital stay, a reduction of in-hospital opioid use, and a lower incidence of opioid-related complications associated with constipation and ileus. Further studies to assess additional potential benefits with long-term follow-up after discharge are warranted.

Erector Spinae Plane Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine: Analgesic Adjunct in Adult Pectus Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Pain management may be challenging in patients undergoing pectus excavatum (PE) bar removal surgery. To enhance recovery, opioid sparing strategies with regional anesthesia including ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) have been implemented. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bilateral ESPB with a liposomal bupivacaine/traditional bupivacaine mixture as part of an enhanced patient recovery pathway. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of adult patients who underwent PE bar removal from January 2019 to December 2020 was performed. Perioperative data were reviewed and recorded. Patients who received ESPB were compared to historical controls (non-ESPB patients). RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included (non-ESPB: 124 patients; ESPB: 78 patients). No adverse events were attributed to ESPB. Non-ESPB patients received more intraoperative opioids (milligram morphine equivalents; 41.8 ± 17.0 mg versus 36.7 ± 17.1, P = 0.05) and were more likely to present to the emergency department within 7 d postoperatively (4.8% versus 0%, P = 0.05) when compared to ESPB patients. No significant difference in total perioperative milligram morphine equivalents, severe pain in postanesthesia care unit (PACU), time from PACU arrival to analgesic administration, PACU length of stay, or postprocedure admission rates between groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing PE bar removal surgery, bilateral ESPB with liposomal bupivacaine was performed without complications. ESPB with liposomal bupivacaine may be considered as an analgesic adjunct to enhance recovery in patients undergoing cardiothoracic procedures but further prospective randomized clinical trials comparing liposomal bupivacaine to traditional local anesthetics with and without indwelling nerve catheters are necessary.

Prognostic factors in resected pulmonary carcinoid tumors: A retrospective study with 10 years of follow­up.

The objective of the present study was to characterize the difference in 10-year carcinoid-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) among patients with resected pulmonary typical carcinoid (TC) and atypical carcinoid (AC). Patients diagnosed with pulmonary carcinoid tumors (PCT) between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2016, were identified. All patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or thoracotomy with thoracic lymphadenectomy. Cumulative CSS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier model. The analysis of hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was performed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. A total of 404 patients with PCT were included in the present study. The 10-year CSS and DFS rates of patients with AC were significantly worse than those of patients with TC (49.1 vs. 86.8% and 52.2 vs. 92.6%, respectively; P<0.001). In the CSS multivariate analysis, older age and lymph node involvement (HR, 2.45; P=0.022) were associated with worse survival in AC, while age, male sex, M1 stage, cigarette smoking and inadequate N2 lymphadenectomy were associate with worse survival in TC. In the recurrence multivariate analysis, N1-3 stage (HR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.16-5.95; P=0.018) and inadequate N2 lymphadenectomy (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.04-4.39; P=0.041) were associated with an increase in recurrence in AC, while male sex (HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.33-10.42; P=0.010) and M1 stage (HR, 14.93; 95% CI, 4.77-46.77; P<0.001) were associated with an increase in recurrence in TC. In conclusion, patients with AC tumors had significantly worse CSS and DFS rates compared with patients with TC. The degree of nodal involvement in AC was a prognostic marker, in contrast to that in TC. Inadequate lymphadenectomy increased the risk of recurrence in AC and mortality in TC, although surgical approaches did not have a significant impact. The present study therefore emphasizes the importance of mediastinal nodal dissection in patients with PCTs.

Pectus Excavatum in Cardiac Surgery Patients.

BACKGROUND: Pectus excavatum frequently accompanies congenital heart disease and connective tissue diseases requiring cardiac surgery. Sometimes the indication is cardiac repair, with the pectus being incidentally noticed; other times, the pectus subsequently develops or becomes more significant after cardiac surgery. This review arms cardiac and congenital surgeons with background about the physiologic impact of pectus, indications for repair and repair strategies, and outcomes for cardiac surgery patients requiring pectus repair. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed using keywords related to pectus excavatum, pectus repair, and cardiac/congenital heart surgery within the PubMed database. RESULTS: The risks of complications related to pectus repair, including in the setting of cardiac surgery or after cardiac surgery, are low in experienced hands, and patients demonstrate cardiopulmonary benefits and symptom relief. Concomitant pectus and cardiac surgery should be considered if it is performed in conjunction with those experienced in pectus repair, particularly given the increased cardiopulmonary impact of pectus after bypass. In the setting of potential bleeding or hemodynamic instability, delayed sternal closure is recommended. For those with anticipated pectus repair after cardiac surgery, the pericardium should be reconstructed for cardiac protection. For those undergoing pectus repair after cardiac surgery without a membrane placed, a "hybrid" approach is safe and effective. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery noted to have pectus should be considered for possible concomitant or staged pectus repair. For those who will undergo a staged procedure, a barrier membrane should be placed before chest closure.

Risk Factors and Techniques for Safe Pectus Bar Removal in Adults After Modified Nuss Repair.

BACKGROUND: The Nuss repair involves implants designed for removal after 2 to 3 years. Although rare, significant complications can occur with bar removal, and the incidence of these complications may be higher in adults. This study was performed to review complications and risk factors associated with bar removal and discuss strategies to improve operative safety. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed including all patients after pectus excavatum repair who underwent Nuss implant removal at Mayo Clinic Arizona (Phoenix, AZ) from 2013 to 2022. RESULTS: In total, 1555 bars were removed (683 patients; 71% men; median age, 34 years[(range, 15-71 years]). Of the removals, 12.45% of patients had bars placed at outside institutions. Major complications were rare, with bleeding most common (2.05%), followed by pneumothorax (0.88%), infection (0.59%), and effusions (0.44%). Most major bleeding (85.71%) occurred from the bar track during removal and was controlled by packing the track. One patient required subsequent hematoma evacuation and transfusion. Bleeding secondary to lung injury was also successfully controlled with packing. Bar removal in 1 patient with significantly displaced bars required sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass as a result of aortic injury. Risk factors identified for bleeding included sternal erosion (P < .001), bar migration (P < .001), higher number of bars (P = .037), and revision of a previous pectus repair (P = 0.001). Bar migration was additionally associated with major complications (P < .001). Older age, although a risk factor for overall complications (P = 0.001), was not a risk factor for bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Bar removal can be safely performed in most patients; however, significant complications, including bleeding, may occur. Identifying potential risk factors and being prepared for rescue maneuvers are critical to prevent catastrophic outcomes.

Chest Pain and Dyspnea After a Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum.

Although infrequent, damage to cardiovascular structures can occur during or following a minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. We present a case of right ventricular outflow tract compression caused by a displaced intrathoracic bar. Removal of the bar resulted in an improvement in symptoms and hemodynamics. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Cardiopulmonary Outcomes After the Nuss Procedure in Pectus Excavatum.

Background Pectus excavatum is the most common chest wall deformity. There is still controversy about cardiopulmonary limitations of this disease and benefits of surgical repair. This study evaluates the impact of pectus excavatum on the cardiopulmonary function of adult patients before and after a modified minimally invasive repair. Methods and Results In this retrospective cohort study, an electronic database was used to identify consecutive adult (aged ≥18 years) patients who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and after primary pectus excavatum repair at Mayo Clinic Arizona from 2011 to 2020. In total, 392 patients underwent preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing; abnormal oxygen consumption results were present in 68% of patients. Among them, 130 patients (68% men, mean age, 32.4±10.0 years) had post-repair evaluations. Post-repair tests were performed immediately before bar removal with a mean time between repair and post-repair testing of 3.4±0.7 years (range, 2.5-7.0). A significant improvement in cardiopulmonary outcomes (P<0.001 for all the comparisons) was seen in the post-repair evaluations, including an increase in maximum, and predicted rate of oxygen consumption, oxygen pulse, oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold, and maximal ventilation. In a subanalysis of 39 patients who also underwent intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography at repair and at bar removal, a significant increase in right ventricle stroke volume was found (P<0.001). Conclusions Consistent improvements in cardiopulmonary function were seen for pectus excavatum adult patients undergoing surgery. These results strongly support the existence of adverse cardiopulmonary consequences from this disease as well as the benefits of surgical repair.

Sex Differences in Objective Measures of Adult Patients Presenting for Pectus Excavatum Repair.

BACKGROUND: Women have a reported incidence of pectus deformities four to five times less than men. Sex differences have not been well studied. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of adult patients (aged 18 years or more) who underwent a pectus excavatum repair at Mayo Clinic in Arizona (January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019). RESULTS: In total, 776 adults underwent pectus repair, with 30% being women. Women presented older (mean age 35 vs 32 years, P = .007) and more symptomatic. Despite this, women performed better on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (higher maximum oxygen consumption and oxygen pulse). Women had more severe deformities (Haller index 5.9 vs 4.3, P < .001). However, in 609 patients undergoing attempted primary minimally invasive pectus repair, intraoperative fractures/osteotomies occurred equally between men and women, with the majority occurring in patients 30 years of age or more (11.5% for age 30 or more, 1.7% for age less than 30; total 7%). Women were also less likely to require three bars for repair (12% vs 42%, P < .001). Hospital length of stay and postoperative complication rates were not significantly different. Postoperatively, women reported a greater daily intensity of pain, but only on the initial postoperative day did they use significantly more opioids than men. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing of 142 patients undergoing baseline and postoperative evaluation at bar removal showed equal and significant benefits in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Women presented for pectus excavatum repair at an older age and with greater symptoms and more severe symptoms. Despite this, women required fewer bars, and there were no significant differences in length of stay or complications. Cardiopulmonary benefits of repair were significant and equal for both women and men.

Acute Toxicities and Short-Term Patient Outcomes After Intensity-Modulated Proton Beam Radiation Therapy or Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Mayo Clinic Experience.

PURPOSE: Intensity modulated proton beam radiation therapy (IMPT) has a clinically significant dosimetric advantage over intensity modulated photon radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer, particularly for sparing the heart and lungs. We compared acute radiation therapy-related toxicities and short-term clinical outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer who received treatment with IMPT or IMRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic health records of consecutive adult patients with esophageal cancer who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy with IMPT or IMRT in the definitive or neoadjuvant setting from January 1, 2014, through June 30, 2018, with additional follow-up data collected through January 31, 2019. Treatment-related toxicities were evaluated per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4. Survival outcomes were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients (32 per group) were included (median follow-up time: 10 months for IMPT patients vs 14 months for IMRT patients). The most common radiation therapy regimen was 45 Gy in 25 fractions, and 80% of patients received a simultaneous integrated boost to a median cumulative dose of 50 Gy. Similar numbers of IMPT patients (n = 15; 47%) and IMRT patients (n = 18; 56%) underwent surgery (P = .07), with no difference in pathologic complete response rates (IMPT: n = 5; 33% vs IMRT: n = 7; 39%; P = .14). At 1 year, the clinical outcomes also were similar for IMPT and IMRT patients, respectively. Local control was 92% versus 84% (P = .87), locoregional control 92% versus 80% (P = .76), distant metastasis-free survival 87% versus 65% (P = .08), progression-free survival 71% versus 45% (P = .15), and overall survival 74% versus 71% (P = .62). The rate of acute treatment-related grade 3 toxicity was similar between the groups (P = .71). CONCLUSIONS: In our early experience, IMPT is a safe and effective treatment when administered as part of definitive or trimodality therapy. Longer follow-up is required to evaluate the effectiveness of IMPT.

Efficacy of standard chest compressions in patients with Nuss bars.

BACKGROUND: The Nuss procedure temporarily places intrathoracic bars for repair of pectus excavatum (PE). The bars may impact excursion and compliance of the anterior chest wall while in place. Effective chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) require depressing the anterior chest wall enough to compress the heart between sternum and spine. We assessed the force required to perform the American Heart Association's recommended chest compression depth after Nuss repair. METHODS: A lumped element elastic model was developed to simulate the relationship between chest compression forces and displacement with focus on the amount of force required to achieve a depth of 5 cm in the presence of 1-3 Nuss bars. Literature review was conducted for evidence supporting potential use of active abdominal compressions and decompression (AACD) as an alternative method of CPR. RESULTS: The presence of bars notably lowered compression depth by a minimum of 69% compared to a chest without bar(s). The model also demonstrated a dramatic increase (minimum of 226%) in compressive forces required to achieve recommended 5 cm depth. Literature review suggests AACD could be an alternative CPR in patients with Nuss bar(s). CONCLUSIONS: In our model, Nuss bars limited the ability to perform chest compressions due to increased force required to achieve a 5 cm compression. The greater the number of Nuss bars present the greater the force required. This may prevent effective CPR. Use of active abdominal compressions and decompressions should be studied further as an alternative resuscitation modality for patients after the Nuss procedure.

Early Outcomes of Patients With Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: The Mayo Clinic Experience.

PURPOSE: There are very little data available comparing outcomes of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC). METHODS: Seventy-nine consecutively treated patients with LA-NSCLC underwent definitive IMPT (n = 33 [42%]) or IMRT (n = 46 [58%]) from 2016 to 2018 at our institution. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Acute and subacute toxicities were graded based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 10.5 months (range, 1-27) for all surviving patients. Most were stage III (80%), received median radiation therapy (RT) dose of 60 Gy (range, 45-72), and had concurrent chemotherapy (65%). At baseline, the IMPT cohort was older (76 vs 69 years, P < .01), were more likely to be oxygen-dependent (18 vs 2%, P = .02), and more often received reirradiation (27 vs 9%, P = .04) than their IMRT counterparts. At 1 year, the IMPT and IMRT cohorts had similar overall survival (68 vs 65%, P = .87), freedom from distant metastasis (71 vs 68%, P = .58), and freedom from locoregional recurrence (86 vs 69%, P = .11), respectively. On multivariate analyses, poorer pulmonary function and older age were associated with grade +3 toxicities during and 3 months after RT, respectively (both P ≤ .02). Only 5 (15%) IMPT and 4 (9%) IMRT patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities 3 months after RT (P = .47). There was 1 treatment-related death from radiation pneumonitis 6 months after IMRT in a patient with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with IMRT, our early experience suggests that IMPT resulted in similar outcomes in a frailer population of LA-NSCLC who were more often being reirradiated. The role of IMPT remains to be defined prospectively.

Successful treatment of visceral pseudoaneurysm after pancreatectomy using flow-diverting stent device.

Aim of the study is the description of the successful management of gastroepiploic artery pseudoaneurysm with preservation of parent vessels using flow-diversion technology. The present report describes the application of a flow-diversion Pipeline™ Flex device for occlusion of a sidewall bleeding pseudoaneurysm on a patient who was status-post sub-total pancreatectomy and remote esophagectomy with a gastric conduit. The pseudoaneurysm was on the solitary vessel supplying the patient's conduit. Use of flow diversion technology excluded the sidewall pseudoaneurysm while maintaining gastric conduit perfusion. In our case, the application of flow diversion technology allowed the preservation of patency of the main arterial supply to the gastric conduit on a post-esophagectomy patient; loss of the right gastroepiploic artery in that case would had been otherwise catastrophic. Flow-diversion technology can be considered for the treatment of pseudoaneurysms post-pancreatic resections, especially when there is no other surgical or endovascular treatment option.